Tell your state legislators: Ban facility fees.
Patients are billed hospital prices for doctor's office care. Outpatient Outrage 2026 explores how this harms patients and what states can do about it.
Send a message.
High Value Health Care, Associate, PIRG
High Value Health Care Campaign, Former Associate, PIRG
Senior Director, Health Care Campaigns, PIRG
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Program, The Public Interest Network
Imagine going to the same doctor for years – annual physicals, testing for strep throat, and writing your prescriptions to control your high cholesterol. For each of these visits, you’ve paid your $20 copay and gone home.
Now imagine going to the same doctor for this year’s physical, paying your copay, and a few days later getting a second bill for $100. You’ve never gotten this charge before, so you’re confident that it’s a mistake. You call the office to get it corrected, but are told to contact a hospital billing department for help. You patiently explain it must be a mistake because you didn’t go to a hospital for care. The billing clerk informs you that the doctor’s office was recently purchased by the hospital and the bill is for the hospital’s “facility fee.” You realize you’ll be on the hook for an extra $100 every time you visit your doctor.
In addition to facility fees, the same care often costs more when conducted in a hospital-owned facility rather than an independent one. Even for simple outpatient procedures, hospitals use their own billing codes that are reimbursed at a higher rate.
There is no evidence that shows charging hospital fees for outpatient care improves patient outcomes, but there are studies that show how much these fees raise prices for patients and their health plans. Consumers are particularly frustrated when these fees are unavoidable, either because they weren’t told about them in advance or when all local practices are now hospital-owned and charging facility fees.
Outpatient outrage 2026 updates our 2024 report. Since then, six additional states joined the 15 states that had some level of protections from unjustified facility fees, bringing the total to 21. We should be paying for what care we receive, not where we receive it. This is the idea behind site neutral payments, where patients are charged the same amount for care, regardless of where it’s provided. This 2026 analysis evaluates both facility fee reform and the concept of site neutral payment policy as a way to eliminate payment disparities for care in different settings. To best illustrate the problem, we’ve included narratives from patients across the country, explaining their frustration and concern.
State legislators should ban senseless facility fees.
Send a message.
States should enact comprehensive policies to curb hospital charges for outpatient care. Patients should pay the same price for care that is safely and routinely done outside of a hospital, regardless of location.
States should adopt a site neutral payment policy to support cost containment through a “same service, same price” standard. It prohibits providers from charging more simply because of where the care was provided. To enforce this, states should also require all hospital outpatient departments and their providers to bill with a unique identification number. Unique billing identifiers allow patients and payers to clearly identify who is sending a bill or making a claim, and if the charge is appropriate.
Facility fee charges should be prohibited for all off-campus outpatient care and for all on-campus outpatient care that is safely and routinely provided outside of a hospital. In addition, providers excluded from the prohibition should be required to provide advance notice of the fee amounts to patients so they can adequately prepare or seek care elsewhere.
States should require public reporting of facility fee charges and payments. This transparency tool will allow policymakers and others to conduct evidence-based analysis for solutions to the high cost of hospital billing for outpatient care.
Noah works on PIRG's High Value Health Care campaign, aiming to lower medical costs without sacrificing the quality of care a person receives. He is originally from Illinois, but now lives in D.C. In his free time, Noah enjoys baking bread.
High Value Health Care Campaign, Former Associate, PIRG
Patricia directs the health care campaign work for U.S. PIRG and provides support to our state offices for state-based health initiatives. Her prior roles include senior policy advisor at NJ Health Care Quality Institute, associate state director at AARP New Jersey and consumer advocate at NJPIRG. She was appointed to the Ground Ambulance and Patient Billing Advisory Committee in 2022 and works with patient advocates across the U.S. Patricia enjoys walking along the Potomac River and sharing her love of books with friends and family around the world.
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Program, The Public Interest Network
Andre directs The Public Interest Network's national campaign staff and programs. His previous roles include national organizing director of the Student PIRGs and executive director of PIRG. He lives in Chicago with his wife and daughter, and is an avid cyclist and chess player.