Tell our governor: No toxic sewage sludge on farms
In a setback for public health, the FDA just rejected a petition to set limits on “forever chemicals” in food
Send your message
Federal Legislative Advocate, U.S. PIRG
Deputy Editor, Editorial & Creative Team, The Public Interest Network
PFAS might be on tonight’s dinner menu.
From kale and blueberries to seafood, meat, and even milk and beer, trace amounts of dangerous PFAS chemicals are creeping into our food and beverages. But despite a growing body of evidence detailing the harms PFAS may present, federal regulators are stepping back.
In a blow to public health, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just rejected a petition to establish mandatory safety limits on PFAS in food, leaving the nation’s food supply unmonitored for dangerous PFAS “forever chemicals”.
PFAS “forever chemicals” are a group of roughly 15,000 human-made synthetic compounds. For decades, manufacturers have relied on them to give raincoats, hiking boots, nonstick pans and other consumer products their liquid-repellent properties.
But while they’re excellent at repelling liquid, they may also dangerous to people. These “forever chemicals” earn their nickname from their virtually indestructible chemical bond, which prevents them from breaking down naturally and allows them to linger in the environment for thousands of years.
They can also build up inside us. While research is still emerging, some studies have linked PFAS to kidney disease, high cholesterol, cancer, birth defects and compromised immune systems. In children, the potential harms are also concerning. Exposure to PFAS may result in reduced cognitive, motor and language development in infancy and increased behavioral issues such as hyperactivity in childhood.
When companies manufacture products that contain PFAS, they may directly or indirectly discharge these chemicals into the environment. And because PFAS are virtually indestructible, they persist in water and soil, polluting our environment for centuries or longer.
From farmland to fork, PFAS is infiltrating our food supply through four key routes:
One of the most direct ways that PFAS enters our food supply is through agriculture practices. Municipal wastewater treatment plants collect industrial and household runoff and process it into nutrient-rich solids known as sewage sludge. But wastewater facilities aren’t equipped to filter out PFAS so, when this sludge is routinely sold or given to farms to be sprayed onto fields as fertilizer, PFAS contaminates soil and crops.
PFAS compounds are also used in agricultural pesticides to help the chemicals disperse or be absorbed. In a double whammy for crops, irrigation water may also be drawn from PFAS-contaminated groundwater.
Farm animals can ingest PFAS by drinking PFAS-contaminated water and by grazing on feed grown in PFAS-polluted soil. These chemicals may accumulate in the animal’s tissues over time, and we may end up ingesting the PFAS that accumulated inside them when we consume beef, pork, poultry, milk or cheese.
Because PFAS persist in water, runoff carrying PFAS can make its way into freshwater lakes, rivers, and coastal ocean waters. Freshwater fish and shellfish can absorb these chemicals from polluted aquatic habitats, leading to PFAS in seafood. And because PFAS chemicals accumulate in animal tissues over time, their concentration may intensify as they move up the food chain.
The simple answer? Not nearly enough.
While there was hope that Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy would address PFAS in our food supply, the FDA’s recent refusal to set formal limits on PFAS in food is a setback for the millions of Americans who are concerned about the safety of what they eat.
Since federal agencies are failing to protect our food from PFAS, we’re urging governors in all 50 states to take the first step in addressing PFAS contamination by banning the spread of PFAS-contaminated sewage sludge as fertilizer on agricultural fields.
There's toxic sewage sludge on farms that grow our food. Take action to help ban fertilizer contaminated with PFAS chemicals.
Send your message
Dina works to advance U.S. PIRG's policy goals in Washington, D.C., including a fair marketplace and preventing toxic threats to our health and safety. Dina moved to Washington, D.C., from Michigan. She is a fan of museums, public parks and Detroit sports teams.
Stephanie writes, edits and proofreads news stories that capture attention for The Public Interest Network. Stephanie lives outside of Boston with her family, where she enjoys running, baking, and exploring the outdoors with her two daughters.