New Survey Shows Banks Still Hiding Fees from Consumers

Media Releases


Portland– A survey of hundreds of banks and credit unions in 24 states and the District of Columbia found that fewer than half of branches obeyed their legal duty to fully disclose fees to prospective customers on the first request, while 12% provided no fee information at all. The surveys conducted in Oregon show that just over half of branches complied, while 15% did not provide any fee information at all.

The survey released today by the Oregon State Public Interest Research Group (OSPIRG) also found that small banks had lower average checking account fees, overdraft fees and foreign or off-us ATM fees, as well as lower balance requirements to avoid checking fees, than big banks. The report, Big Banks, Bigger Fees: A National Survey of Bank Fees 2012, includes consumer tips and a local comparison shopping guide.

“Consumers should reject the myth that the days of free checking are gone,” said Celeste Meiffren, OSPIRG’s Consumer and Taxpayer Advocate. “Consider moving your money to a small bank or credit union to avoid those big fees at the big banks.”

Surveyors visited 250 bank branches in 17 states and the District of Columbia to compare fees and determine whether banks were complying with the 1991 Truth In Savings Act, which requires disclosure of all account-related fees to prospective customers. In 2008, the U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued a report finding that researchers “could not obtain” complete fee schedules at 22% of bank branches visited. PIRG found identical results in its 2011 report and some improvement in 2012.

“The Truth in Savings Act is a simple law that helps consumers shop around, but compliance with it is poor, which makes it harder to be a smart consumer,” said Meiffren.

Among the findings of Big Banks, Bigger Fees:
•    Only 48% of banks visited provided researchers with fee schedules as required by law on their first request. After two or more requests, eventually a total of 72% complied with the law.
•    More than 1 in 10 (12%) never complied and refused to provide fee information, claimed that they didn’t have it, or told researchers to “go online.”
•    Researchers found a wide variety of free or low-cost checking options, with 63% of small banks and 60% of credit unions providing totally free checking. Although the biggest banks have recently tightened requirements to obtain free checking (available at 24%), it is still available at more than half of big banks with a regular direct deposit (59%).
•    The survey found that that small banks had lower average checking account fees, overdraft fees and foreign or off-use ATM fees, as well as lower balance requirements to avoid checking fees, than big banks.

A shopping guide included in the report compares banking options, directs consumers to free and low-cost checking choices, and provides a list of fees that consumers should look out for when picking a bank. The group urged consumers to vote with their feet when they found that bank fees were too high.

“Big banks are doing what they always do – raise fees – but trying to blame regulation for it,” said Meiffren. “But free checking is still there for consumers who look for it and there are a lot of ways to avoid high bank fees.”

OSPIRG also made a series of recommendations to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which took over most consumer rule-writing for banks and other financial firms in July 2011. The CFPB also took over supervision of all big banks. It called on the CFPB to enforce the Truth in Savings Act, and to require banks to post fees on the web in searchable formats and make fee disclosures in a clear, tabular format – not buried in cumbersome multi-page brochures hidden deep inside websites.

“Banks will continue to ignore the Truth in Savings Act and other consumer laws until the CFPB tells them to do a better job,” concluded Meiffren. “Consumers do have more options than they think they do, but the CFPB can make it easier to shop around.”

For the full report, go here: