{"id":3446,"date":"2026-10-13T20:00:58","date_gmt":"2026-10-14T00:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/"},"modified":"2026-10-14T17:53:44","modified_gmt":"2026-10-14T21:53:44","slug":"pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams","status":"publish","type":"resource","link":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/","title":{"rendered":"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams"},"featured_media":67697,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":false,"_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-description":""},"campaign_tax":[],"display_option":[],"issue_tax":[],"resource_type":[64],"region_tax":[],"state":[2],"topic_tax":[111,113],"class_list":["post-3446","resource","type-resource","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"details":{"helper_taxonomies":{"topics":[111,113],"collection":false,"press_type":false,"person_type":false,"resource_type":64,"event_type":false,"campaigns":false,"department":false,"level":false,"states":[2],"act_option":false,"display_option":false,"primary":{"topic":111}},"subtitle":"\u201cForever chemicals\u201d are contaminating waterways across the United States.","excerpt":"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?","featured_image":67697,"caption_override":"","updated_on":null,"sidebar_action":[],"related_event":"","hide_hero_image":false,"location":"internal","external_link":{"publication_name":"","url":""},"file":null,"sidebar_action_query_string":""},"helper_people_group":{"title":"Authors","entities":[{"type":"dynamic","dynamic_person":{"site":15,"people":"6115"},"information":{"name":"","image":null,"role":"","biography":"","contact":{"twitter":"","facebook":"","email":"","phone":""}}},{"type":"dynamic","dynamic_person":{"site":16,"people":"18750"},"information":{"name":"","image":null,"role":"","biography":"","contact":{"twitter":"","facebook":"","email":"","phone":""}}},{"type":"dynamic","dynamic_person":{"site":3,"people":"5363"},"information":{"name":"","image":null,"role":"","biography":"","contact":{"twitter":"","facebook":"","email":"","phone":""}}}]},"helper_downloads":{"title":"Downloads","files":null},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are vital ecosystems and are places where people swim, paddle and fish. Many provide water we drink. Contaminants in these waterways can harm us directly when we drink or recreate in the water, and sometimes indirectly, when pollutants accumulate in fish that we eat. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called \u201cforever chemicals,\u201d are among the water pollutants that can put our health and the environment at risk.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An analysis of federal, state and non-profit testing data<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show between 2022 and 2024, <\/span><b>PFAS were detected at 83% out of 1,602 locations tested <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">across the United States. These results are a subset of all PFAS testing that has taken place across the country. And the contamination they reveal is likely just the tip of the iceberg, as many waterways are not tested for PFAS at all.<\/span>\r\n<h3><b>What are PFAS and why are they a problem?<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/sustainability.yale.edu\/explainers\/yale-experts-explain-pfas-forever-chemicals\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">), are a class of synthetic chemicals that persist in the environment for decades. Because they <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/sustainability.yale.edu\/explainers\/yale-experts-explain-pfas-forever-chemicals\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">break down<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> very slowly, PFAS can accumulate in the environment and in the human body over time. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.atsdr.cdc.gov\/pfas\/about\/health-effects.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Long-term exposure<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to certain PFAS has been associated with an increased risk of some cancers, immune system suppression, reproductive and developmental effects, and other adverse health outcomes. Once released into the environment, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.usgs.gov\/publication\/ofr20241001\/full\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> can persist in rivers, lakes and streams, where they may remain dissolved in the water and accumulate in sediment and aquatic organisms.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Separate from the surface water data examined in this report, there is also <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0013935122024926?via%3Dihub\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">significant evidence of PFAS accumulating in freshwater fish<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which scientists are now calling a potentially significant source of forever chemicals in our bodies.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite growing concern about PFAS contamination, relatively little is known about how widespread these chemicals are in America's surface waters. This analysis examined PFAS monitoring data collected from rivers, lakes, streams and other surface waters between 2022 and 2024, drawing primarily on data from the EPA\u2019s <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.waterqualitydata.us\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Water Quality Portal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (WQP) and additional monitoring data generously shared by <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/waterkeeper.org\/news\/new-analysis-finds-pfas-in-98-of-tested-u-s-waterways-across-19-states\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Waterkeeper Alliance <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and its network of local Waterkeeper groups and state agencies in Maine and Massachusetts. <\/span><b>(See methodology for more details.)<\/b>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Across the United States, PFAS were detected at least once at <\/span><b>1,329 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">of <\/span><b>1,602<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> monitored locations at rivers, lakes, streams and other surface waters between 2022 and 2024.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> As many as 114 different PFAS compounds were detected at one or more water testing locations.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Because PFAS monitoring remains limited in many parts of the country and not all PFAS monitoring results nationally are reported through the WQP, these findings likely represent only a portion of existing contamination.<\/span>\r\n<h3><b>Explore PFAS in waterways near you<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The interactive map below shows where PFAS have been detected. Clicking on a monitoring location provides additional information, including the number of PFAS compounds tested, the number detected, the percentage of sampling events with PFAS detections, and the highest reported PFAS concentration and the compound associated with that measurement.<\/span>","":null}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_embed","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_embed":{"width":"wide","type":"code","title":"","code":"<div class=\"flourish-embed flourish-map\" data-src=\"visualisation\/30148552?106652\"><script src=\"https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/embed.js\"><\/script><noscript><img src=\"https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/30148552\/thumbnail\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"map visualization\" \/><\/noscript><\/div>","media":null,"caption":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Across all monitoring data included in this analysis, 174 different PFAS compounds were tested, and 114 were detected at least once. Individual locations were not tested for all 174 compounds. PFAS compounds differ in their toxicity, persistence and potential health effects, and some have been studied much more extensively than others. Therefore, detections and concentrations of different PFAS should not be interpreted as equivalent measures of health risk. A lack of toxicity data does not necessarily mean that a PFAS compound is safe.<\/span>","":null}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_embed","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_embed":{"width":"narrow","type":"code","title":"","code":"<div class=\"flourish-embed flourish-table\" data-src=\"visualisation\/30335005?106652\"><script src=\"https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/embed.js\"><\/script><noscript><img src=\"https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/30335005\/thumbnail\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"table visualization\" \/><\/noscript><\/div>","media":null,"caption":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_large_image","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_large_image":{"width":"wide","image":"","caption_override":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At least 15 states\u00a0 have also published PFAS monitoring data from surface waters collected in 2022 or later. Some of these data may also be represented in the Water Quality Portal or other sources used in this analysis, while others are not included. (<\/span><b>See the Appendix for links to these state data sources<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">).<\/span>\r\n<h3><b>How does PFAS get into our waterways?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Because forever chemicals are used so <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/pfas\/our-current-understanding-human-health-and-environmental-risks-pfas\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">widely<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in our economy, they wind up in our waterways through an astonishing array of pollution pathways. In some cases, industrial facilities directly <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/2023-07\/PFAS-BMP-Fact-Sheet.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">discharge<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> PFAS into waterways, or send PFAS-tainted wastewater to sewage treatment plants which then release their own discharges. With so many consumer products containing PFAS, the leachate from landfills can also contain these chemicals, and that too is often sent to treatment plants. And in addition to PFAS in sewage plant effluent, they are also commonly <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencefriday.com\/segments\/fertilizer-sewage-forever-chemicals\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">found<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in sewage biosolids, which is now being sold to farmers as fertilizer, and PFAS can run off farmland to contaminate nearby waters that way. The widespread use of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/earth.org\/decades-of-using-pfas-based-firefighting-foam-left-behind-a-toxic-legacy\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS in firefighting foam<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 especially at military bases and airports \u2014 has also contaminated nearby waters.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For toxic chemicals like PFAS that persist over time and contaminate our water and health through numerous pathways, there is simply no safe way to \u201cmanage\u201d their ubiquitous use in our economy.<\/span>\r\n<h3><b>Case studies of PFAS contamination<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While PFAS contamination was identified across the country, several waterways show the diverse ways these chemicals appear in the environment.<\/span>","":null}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_large_image","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_large_image":{"width":"wide","image":"","caption_override":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<h4><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-67698 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/environmentamerica.org\/center\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/mississippi.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1500\" height=\"1130\" \/><\/h4>\r\n<h4>Mississippi River<\/h4>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS were detected at all 39 Mississippi River monitoring locations in Minnesota and Wisconsin that are included in the analysis. Across these locations, 13 different PFAS compounds were detected, with the highest measured concentration reaching 23.3 ng\/L for PFBA at a monitoring location near Hastings, Minn. Oral exposure to PFBA is <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/newsreleases\/epa-publishes-iris-handbook-and-final-iris-assessment-perfluorobutanoic-acid-pfba-and\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">considered<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> likely to cause thyroid, liver and developmental effects in humans.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In 2018, 3M agreed to provide <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ag.state.mn.us\/Office\/Cases\/3M\/docs\/Agreement.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$850 million<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to the state of Minnesota to settle a lawsuit over the company\u2019s <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/3msettlement.state.mn.us\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">alleged PFAS contamination<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of drinking water supplies in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area; the settlement did not constitute an admission of fault or liability by 3M. The company <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.3m.com\/3M\/en_US\/pfas-stewardship\/uses-applications\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">completed<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> its exit from PFAS manufacturing at the end of 2025.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition, along portions of the river, monitoring locations are near airports, military facilities, wastewater treatment plants and oil refineries, all of which have been <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.usgs.gov\/publication\/ofr20241001\/full\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">identified <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in previous studies as <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/pfas\/our-current-understanding-human-health-and-environmental-risks-pfas\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">potential sources <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">of PFAS releases.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<hr \/>\r\n\r\n<h4><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-67699 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/environmentamerica.org\/center\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ontario.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1500\" height=\"1130\" \/><\/h4>\r\n<h4>Lake Ontario<\/h4>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS were detected at all monitored locations around Lake Ontario during the study period. Eight different PFAS compounds were detected at at least one location along the lake, with the highest measured concentration reaching 11 ng\/L for PFBA. <\/span>\r\n\r\n<hr \/>\r\n\r\n<h4><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-67700 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/environmentamerica.org\/center\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rabbitlakefl.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1500\" height=\"1130\" \/><\/h4>\r\n<h4><b>Tiger Lake (Fla.)<\/b><\/h4>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tiger Lake is a freshwater lake <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/guidesly.com\/fishing\/waterbodies\/tiger-lake-fl\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">used <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">for fishing and other recreational activities, including kayaking and paddling. The presence of PFAS in a lake used for these activities is notable because people can encounter PFAS through eating fish in which certain PFAS have accumulated. PFAS were detected at all six monitored locations around Tiger Lake included in the analysis. Across these locations, 36 different PFAS compounds were detected, with the highest quantified concentration reaching 19 ng\/L for PFBS at the Tiger Lake.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<hr \/>\r\n\r\n<h3><b>Highest PFAS concentrations<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Several monitoring locations reported particularly high concentrations of individual PFAS compounds. The highest concentration in the dataset was recorded in Brunswick, Maine, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.maine.gov\/dep\/news\/news.html?id=12955895\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">following<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> an accidental release of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) at Brunswick Executive Airport in August 2024. Approximately 1,450 gallons of AFFF mixed with about 50,000 gallons of water were released from an airport hangar and entered nearby stormwater ponds. Testing by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection found PFOS at 1,040,000 ng\/L at the inlet of one affected surface-water retention pond.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Other locations with high reported PFAS concentrations included Lake Holloman in New Mexico, where PFHxA concentrations reached approximately 30,000 ng\/L near Holloman Air Force Base; Sargent Creek in Minnesota, adjacent to a fire training facility; the Animas River in Colorado; waterways near Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport in Wisconsin; and locations near Fernando Luis Ribas Dominicci Airport in Puerto Rico. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newmexicopbs.org\/productions\/groundwater-war\/2020\/12\/01\/questions-remain-about-pfas-pollution-from-holloman\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Past use of AFFF<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in firefighting operations and training has been identified as a source of PFAS contamination at Holloman Air Force Base. Several of the other locations are also near airports or firefighting facilities, where PFAS-containing AFFF has historically been <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nfpa.org\/news-blogs-and-articles\/nfpa-journal\/2022\/07\/22\/the-new-foam\/foam-sidebar\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">used <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">for firefighting, equipment testing and training.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n<h3><b>Progress is possible if we turn off the toxic tap<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The data in this report show widespread PFAS contamination of America\u2019s waterways. Yet there is reason for hope. Following manufacturers\u2019 move away from some common types of PFAS, researchers found <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/environmentamerica.org\/articles\/a-little-good-news-study-shows-declining-pfas-levels-in-great-lakes-fish\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">declining levels<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of these particular forever chemicals in <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0380133026000018?dgcid=raven_sd_aip_email#f0030\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Great Lakes fish.<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span>\r\n<h3><b>Policy recommendations<\/b><\/h3>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The widespread detection of PFAS in rivers, lakes and streams shows the need to prevent more of these persistent chemicals from entering the environment. Policymakers should:<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><b>Phase out the use of PFAS<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, especially when used for convenience and where safer alternatives are already available,<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><b>Require industrial facilities <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to stop releasing these chemicals to our waterways and remove them from wastewater they send to sewage treatment plants,<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><b>End the application<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of PFAS-laden sewage sludge on farmland, and<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li><b>Continue monitoring PFAS in surface waters<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to identify where contamination is occurring, determine the extent of contamination and track changes in PFAS levels over time.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Monitoring can help reveal the scope of PFAS contamination, but it cannot solve the problem on its own. Ultimately, pro<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">tecting America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams requires stopping PFAS pollution at its source.<\/span>","":null}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_accordion","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_accordion":{"title":"","entries":[{"title":"Methodology","content":"<b>Data acquisition<\/b>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To evaluate the occurrence of PFAS contamination in U.S. surface waters, we analyzed water quality monitoring data collected between 2022 and 2024 from rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs and other surface water bodies.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Most of the monitoring data used in this analysis were obtained through the National Water Quality Monitoring Council's Water Quality Portal (WQP). The Water Quality Portal is a publicly accessible database that serves as a clearinghouse for water quality monitoring data submitted by federal, state, tribal and local agencies, as well as other monitoring organizations. The portal integrates data from EPA's Water Quality Exchange (WQX), the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water Information System (NWIS) and other monitoring programs, providing a centralized source for water quality information across the U.S.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For this analysis, we downloaded all available surface water monitoring records for PFAS compounds collected during 2022, 2023 and 2024. Records labeled as \u201cDrinking water,\u201d as well as records identified as groundwater, wastewater or other non-surface-water samples, were excluded.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To supplement the Water Quality Portal, additional PFAS monitoring datasets were obtained directly from monitoring organizations and some state agencies.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Waterkeeper Alliance provided two national PFAS <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/waterkeeper.org\/news\/new-analysis-finds-pfas-in-98-of-tested-u-s-waterways-across-19-states\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">datasets<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. The first consisted of monitoring conducted by Waterkeeper Alliance with local Waterkeeper organizations in rivers and streams across the U.S. near wastewater treatment plants and biosolids land application fields and was published in 2025. The second consisted of monitoring conducted by Waterkeeper Alliance with local Waterkeeper organizations in rivers, lakes and streams across the U.S. and was published in 2022. Both datasets were standardized and incorporated into the analysis.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Massachusetts monitoring data were obtained from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Maine monitoring data were obtained from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Because Maine and Massachusetts records were not comprehensively represented in the Water Quality Portal, PFAS monitoring results from both the department's 2022 and 2024 surface water sampling programs were standardized and incorporated into the analysis.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Other state agencies and monitoring organizations conduct PFAS testing for a variety of purposes. Obtaining comprehensive data from all 50 states (independent of the data states uploaded to the WQP) was beyond the scope of this project.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Data processing and analysis<\/b>\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Monitoring records from all data sources were standardized to a common data structure before analysis. Variable names, reporting formats and analytical result fields were harmonized to create a single integrated dataset.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS analyte names were standardized across datasets to ensure that equivalent compounds reported under different naming conventions were treated consistently. Reporting units were also standardized. Results reported in micrograms per liter (\u00b5g\/L) were converted to nanograms per liter (ng\/L). Records reported in non-comparable analytical units were excluded from the analysis.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Additional geographic standardization was performed before analysis. Geographic coordinates were converted to a common coordinate reference system, and monitoring locations were assigned to states using spatial joins with U.S. Census Bureau geographic boundary files. For records lacking geographic coordinates or state information, additional information was obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, state datasets and publicly available mapping resources to allow for the assignment of coordinates to monitoring locations. Monitoring locations with incomplete geographic information were manually reviewed and corrected where sufficient supporting information was available.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Monitoring location names were also standardized across datasets. Missing monitoring location names were populated where possible using U.S. Geological Survey station information, state-provided datasets and manual review of online information.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Quality assurance and quality control records that did not represent environmental samples, including laboratory blanks, field blanks, duplicate samples and other quality-control sample types, were excluded from the analysis. Additional records accompanied by laboratory comments indicating that analytical identification did not meet method acceptance criteria, or that results were affected by laboratory interference or contamination, were also excluded. Maine records identified as biased high, including results affected by blank contamination or other quality-control issues identified as causing high bias, were also excluded, as were results with B or JB validation qualifiers.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Each analytical result was assigned one of two detection categories: detected (Y) or not clearly present (N). Results were classified as \u201cdetected\u201d when a numerical testing result indicated the presence of PFAS or when laboratory comments or other analytical information indicated that PFAS had been detected, including detections above the detection threshold but below the reporting threshold. Results were classified as \u201cnot clearly present\u201d when analytical results or associated metadata indicated that the compound was not detected or was below the laboratory detection limit. Results for which the available information did not provide sufficient evidence of a detection, including less-than values without supporting detection information or records with ambiguous analytical metadata, were also treated as non-detections. Because PFAS are toxic even in miniscule concentrations and all testing methods have lower limits for their ability to detect the compounds, even a test that fails to detect PFAS does not necessarily indicate that PFAS are not present in the sample.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">PFAS detection status was determined using a hierarchical decision process that evaluated multiple fields associated with each analytical result, including reported concentrations, detection condition fields, laboratory comments, result comments and qualifier codes. Reported numeric concentrations were classified as detections unless laboratory comments or other analytical metadata indicated that the reported value should not be interpreted as a valid environmental detection. Records indicating that analytes were present below laboratory quantification limits were also classified as detections because the analyte had been identified in the sample, even if it could not be quantified. Records indicating that analytes were below detection limits or not detected were classified as non-detections. Records for which the available information was insufficient to determine whether a detection had occurred were classified as not detected. Records containing no analytical information from which a detection status could be determined were excluded from the analysis.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Monitoring records were then aggregated by monitoring location. A monitoring location represents a specific sampling site identified by its monitoring-location or station identifier in the source data. Multiple samples collected at the same monitoring location over time were therefore grouped together.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For each monitoring location, we calculated the total number of testing instances, defined as individual analytical results for a specific PFAS compound from a specific sampling event. We also calculated the number of unique PFAS compounds tested, the number of compounds detected at least once, the number of sampling events, the number of sampling events during which at least one PFAS compound was detected, and the percentage of sampling events with at least one PFAS detection. Monitoring locations were classified according to whether PFAS was detected during every sampling event or during fewer than all sampling events.<\/span>"},{"title":"Terms and definitions","content":"The detailed meanings of the terms used in the report are as follows:\r\n\r\n<strong>Testing instances:<\/strong> The total number of individual PFAS test results reported for a location. Each result for a specific PFAS compound from a specific sampling event counts as one testing instance.\r\n\r\n<strong>Parameters tested:<\/strong> The number of unique PFAS compounds tested for at a location. In this analysis, a \u201cparameter\u201d refers to an individual PFAS compound, such as PFOA or PFOS. A compound is counted only once, regardless of how many times it was tested.\r\n\r\n<strong>Parameters positive:<\/strong> The number of unique PFAS compounds that were detected at least once at a location. Each compound is counted only once, even if it was detected during multiple sampling events.\r\n\r\n<strong>Sampling events:<\/strong> The number of unique dates on which samples were collected at a location. Multiple PFAS compounds may be tested during a single sampling event.\r\n\r\nFor example, if a location was sampled on three different dates and tested for the same 40 PFAS compounds each time, with 10 different PFAS compounds detected at least once, the report would show 120 testing instances, 40 parameters tested, 10 parameters positive and three sampling events."},{"title":"Acknowledgements","content":"The authors thank Waterkeeper Alliance for generously sharing sampling data collected by local Waterkeeper organizations in several states. The authors also thank Chelsea McDonald and Kelly Hunter Foster of Waterkeeper Alliance for reviewing this report. The authors also thank the Park Foundation and the McDonnell Stevens Family for their generous support of this work. Thanks also to Tony Dutzik, Elizabeth Ridlington and Arielle Schultz of Frontier Group for their contributions and editorial support."},{"title":"Appendix: Additional state PFAS surface water data","content":"<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The following states have published information on PFAS in surface waters from 2022 or later. These data may or may not be included in the sources used for this report.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Colorado:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/cdphe.colorado.gov\/pfas\/mapping\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS sampling and mapping. Includes surface water monitoring and additional PFAS sampling efforts.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Iowa:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iowadnr.gov\/media\/7038\/download?inline\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Iowa Department of Natural Resources<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS monitoring data. Includes surface water samples published in 2023.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Michigan:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigan.gov\/egle\/maps-data\/mpart-pfas-gis\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, PFAS Surface Water Sampling<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. The state provides downloadable surface water monitoring data and an interactive map.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Montana:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/deq.mt.gov\/files\/DEQAdmin\/PFAS\/2026_PFAS_FishTissue_Report_FINAL.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS surface water and fish tissue monitoring. The state's 2023 monitoring included surface water sampling.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>New York:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/experience.arcgis.com\/experience\/2a5c1a31514c4965882917e74ec31c1f\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">New York State Department of Environmental Conservation<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS monitoring map. The map includes surface water data collected over multiple years, including 2022 and later.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Ohio:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/data-oepa.opendata.arcgis.com\/search?layout=grid&amp;tags=public%2520drinking%2520water\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ohio Environmental Protection Agency<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS surface water monitoring. The state sampled PFAS at 149 large-river sites in 2023\u20132024.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Pennsylvania:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/files.dep.state.pa.us\/Water\/Drinking%20Water%20and%20Facility%20Regulation\/WaterQualityPortalFiles\/CECs\/Surface_Water_PFAS_Summary_2019-2023.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Surface Water PFAS Summary, 2019\u20132023. The dataset includes surface water monitoring conducted through 2023.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>South Carolina: <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/des.sc.gov\/sites\/des\/files\/media\/document\/BOW_PFAS_AmbientSurfaceWaterFinalReport.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Contro<\/span><b>l<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Ambient Surface Water PFAS Monitoring. The state sampled more than 100 surface water locations in 2022\u20132023.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Tennessee:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.arcgis.com\/apps\/dashboards\/c7c1f4db5bc341a1ae0ea50894f4353d#\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC)<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. The state provides monitoring information for surface waters used as drinking water sources.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Texas<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.plos.org\/water\/article?id=10.1371\/journal.pwat.0000554\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Handling left-censored PFAS data in surface-water reconnaissance: A reproducible workflow applied to ten sites in the Trinity River headwaters, Texas<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Virginia:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.deq.virginia.gov\/news-info\/shortcuts\/topics-of-interest\/per-and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Virginia Department of Environmental Quality<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS monitoring. State information includes hundreds of surface water samples collected in 2023.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Washington:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/doh.wa.gov\/data-and-statistical-reports\/washington-tracking-network-wtn\/pfas\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Washington State Department of Health<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS monitoring. The state provides downloadable monitoring data that include source waters used by drinking water systems.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<b>Wisconsin:<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/data-wi-dnr.opendata.arcgis.com\/datasets\/wi-dnr::em-pfas-surface-water-and-fish-tissue-sampling\/explore?location=44.610650%2C-90.083250%2C7\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, PFAS Surface Water and Fish Tissue Sampling. The state provides multi-year surface water monitoring data through an interactive map and downloadable dataset.<\/span>"}]}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_featured_action","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_featured_action":{"action":[3441],"action_query_string":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_featured_action","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_featured_action":{"action":[],"action_query_string":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_featured_action","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_featured_action":{"action":[],"action_query_string":""}}],"site_specific_content":""},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.8 (Yoast SEO v28.8) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"PIRGIM Education Fund\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-14T21:53:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/publicinterestnetwork.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-14T00:00:58+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-10-14T21:53:44+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/publicinterestnetwork.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/publicinterestnetwork.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/resources\\\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"PIRGIM Education Fund\",\n\t            \"description\": \"\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/pirg.org\\\/michigan\\\/edfund\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams","description":"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams","og_description":"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?","og_url":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/","og_site_name":"PIRGIM Education Fund","article_modified_time":"2026-10-14T21:53:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1600,"height":900,"url":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/","url":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/","name":"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/publicinterestnetwork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg","datePublished":"2026-10-14T00:00:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-14T21:53:44+00:00","description":"America\u2019s rivers, lakes and streams are places we drink from, fish and enjoy. How widespread is PFAS contamination in these waters, and what can we do about it?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/publicinterestnetwork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/publicinterestnetwork.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/montana-river-Jonny-Armstrong-usgs-public-domain.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/resources\/pfas-found-in-americas-lakes-and-streams\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PFAS found in America\u2019s lakes and streams"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/#website","url":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/","name":"PIRGIM Education Fund","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"PIRGIM Education Fund","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/3446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resource"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/3446\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3449,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource\/3446\/revisions\/3449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"campaign_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/campaign_tax?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"display_option","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/display_option?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"issue_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue_tax?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"resource_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resource_type?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"region_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region_tax?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"state","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/state?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"topic_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pirg.org\/michigan\/edfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic_tax?post=3446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}