New Report: Georgia Receives a “C+” in Annual Report on Transparency of Government Spending
Georgia PIRG Education Fund
ATLANTA, March 26 – Georgia received a “C+” when it comes to government spending transparency, according to “Following the Money 2013: How the States Rank on Providing Online Access to Government Spending Data [http://www.georgiapirgedfund.org/reports/gap/following-money-2013],” the fourth annual report of its kind by the Georgia PIRG Education Fund.
“State governments across the country have become more transparent about where public money goes, providing citizens with the information they need to hold elected officials and businesses that receive public funds accountable,” said Laura Murray, Program Associate with the Georgia PIRG Education Fund. “But Georgia still has a long way to go.”
Officials from Georgia and 47 other states provided the researchers with feedback on their initial evaluation of state transparency websites. The leading states with the most comprehensive transparency websites are Texas, Massachusetts, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, and Oklahoma.
Based on an inventory of the content and ease-of-use of states’ transparency websites, “Following the Money 2013” assigns each state a grade of “A” to “F.” Described in the report as an “emerging state,” Georgia’s website provides searchable checkbook-level information on most types of state spending. However, it does not include data on economic development tax credits and does not list the projected and achieved benefits of economic development subsidies.
This is the second consecutive year that Georgia’s transparency website earned a “C+” grade. Grading standards rise each year, so states need to improve transparency each year to be a leader.
Since last year’s “Following the Money” report, there has been remarkable progress across the country with new states providing online access to government spending information and several states pioneering new tools to further expand citizens’ access to this data.
One of the most striking findings in this year’s report is that all 50 states now provide at least some checkbook-level detail about individual government expenditures. In 48 states—all except California and Vermont—this information is now searchable. Just three years ago, only 32 states provided checkbook-level information on state spending online, and only 29 states provided that information in searchable form. Thirty-nine state transparency websites now include tax expenditure reports, providing information on government expenditures through tax code deductions, exemptions and credits—up from just eight states three years ago.
“Open information about the public purse is crucial for democratic and effective government,” said Murray. “It is not possible to ensure that government spending decisions are fair and efficient unless information is publicly accessible.”
The states with the most transparent spending stand out partly because they are comprehensive about the kinds of spending they include, such as data on economic development subsidies, expenditures granted through the tax code, and quasi-public agencies. At least six states have launched brand new transparency websites since last year’s report, and most made improvements that are documented in the report. The best state transparency tools are highly searchable, engage citizens, and include detailed information—allowing all the information to be put to good use.
States that have created or improved their online transparency have typically done so with little upfront cost. In fact, top-flight transparency websites can save money for taxpayers, while also restoring public confidence in government and preventing misspending and pay-to-play contracts.
“The state of Georgia should improve the breadth and ease-of-access of online government spending information,” said Murray, “Given our state budget problems, Georgians need to be able to follow the money.”
The state’s transparency website can be viewed at: open.georgia.gov
To read the report, click here: http://www.georgiapirgedfund.org/reports/gap/following-money-2013.
# # #
Georgia PIRG Education Fund conducts research and public education on behalf of consumers and the public interest. Our research, analysis, reports and outreach serve as counterweights to the influence of powerful special interests that threaten our health, safety or well-being. www.georgiapirgedfund.org