Big Banks Bigger Fees 2012

A National Survey of Fees and Disclosure Compliance

A survey of hundreds of banks and credit unions in 24 states and the District of Columbia found that free checking remains available at more than 6 out of 10 small banks and credit unions but was only found at one-quarter of surveyed big banks (those with over $10 billion in deposits). The survey released today by the California Public Interest Research Group also revealed that fewer than half of branches surveyed obeyed their legal duty to fully disclose fees to prospective customers on the first request, while 12% provided no fee information at all. 


CALPIRG Education Fund

Executive Summary

Since Congress largely deregulated consumer deposit (checking and savings) accounts beginning in the early 1980s, the state PIRGs have tracked bank deposit account fee changes and documented the banks’ long-term strategy to raise fees, invent new fees and make it harder to avoid fees.

Over the last six months, state PIRG staff conducted inquiries at 250 bank and 116 credit union branches in 17 states and the District of Columbia and reviewed bank fees online in these and 7 other states. This report, “Big Banks, Bigger Fees: A National Survey of Fees and Disclosure Compliance,” examines the following questions:

  • How easy is it for consumers to shop around? Are banks complying with the Truth In Savings Act, which requires disclosure of a schedule of account fees to prospective customers?
  • Can consumers still find free or low-cost checking accounts or has free checking ended? ␣ What can the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and other regulators do to help improve transparency in the financial marketplace?

The CFPB writes the consumer law rules for all banks and supervises or examines compliance of the largest banks (over $10 billion in deposits). For the purpose of this report, we call those “big banks” and others “small banks.”

Key Findings:

  • Only 48% of bank branches visited provided researchers with fee schedules as re- quired by law on their first request. After two or more requests, eventually a total of 72% complied with the law.
  • More than 1 in 10 (12%) branches never complied and refused to provide fee infor- mation at all, claimed that they didn’t have it or that it was only available if you ap- plied for an account or told researchers to “go online.” Another 16% only provided partial information.
  • Researchers found a wide variety of free or low-cost checking options, with 63% of small banks and 60% of credit unions providing totally free checking. Although the biggest banks have recently tightened requirements to obtain totally free checking (available at only 24% of big bank branches), it is still available at more than half of big banks with a regular direct deposit (59%).
  • The survey found that small banks had lower average checking account fees, over- draft fees and foreign or off-us ATM fees, as well as lower balance requirements to avoid checking fees, than big banks.
  • In a surprising finding, fully one-quarter of small banks are no longer charging their regular checking account customers so-called “off-us” ATM fees through a variety of regional and national ATM networks, including Plus, Smartpass, Presto, the SUM network and others. Additionally, others are providing at least 2-4 off-us transactions monthly at no charge. These practices undercut one of the presumed major benefits of an account at a big bank—access to large no-cost ATM networks. Some small banks are also reimbursing several or all surcharges paid monthly (surcharges are the fees imposed by the off-us ATM owner). Conversely, only two big banks (6%) waived off- us ATM fees on basic checking accounts and one of those only did in one of its markets.
  • While more than half of big banks (62%) posted their full fee schedules on the web, versus less than one-third of small banks (29%), finding the fees was often a scaven- ger hunt. Many banks, especially big banks, placed fees in massive, clunky PDF files. Some banks even hid fee schedule links in footnotes or, worse, in their “site maps,” with no link available from the “compare checking accounts” page or any other pag- es.